<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Life of Constant Flux &#187; Gaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelmarcey.com/tag/gaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelmarcey.com</link>
	<description>Being Self-Employed, Technology, Raising Kids, Life's Journey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OnLive &#8211; Intel, AMD, Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo Had Better Be On High Alert</title>
		<link>http://joelmarcey.com/2009/03/31/onlive-intel-amd-microsoft-sony-nintendo-had-better-be-on-high-alert/</link>
		<comments>http://joelmarcey.com/2009/03/31/onlive-intel-amd-microsoft-sony-nintendo-had-better-be-on-high-alert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Marcey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Laporte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnLive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Thurrott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelmarcey.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was listening to Windows Weekly the other day, and the topic of OnLive came up. Maybe I live under a rock, but I had never heard of OnLive. Well, I have now. And if their vision comes to fruition, there better be some companies that better get in gear or start to s#%t in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="clear: both">I was listening to <a href="http://twit.tv/ww" target="_blank">Windows Weekly</a> the other day, and the topic of <a href="http://www.onlive.com/" target="_blank">OnLive</a> came up. Maybe I live under a rock, but I had never heard of OnLive. Well, I have now. And if their vision comes to fruition, there better be some companies that better get in gear or start to s#%t in their pants.</p>
<p style="clear: both">OnLive, in a nutshell, is a &#8220;cloud&#8221; video game service. In other words, all video games live on their servers and you subscribe to the ones that you want to play. But you don&#8217;t download the games to your machine and play them locally. You play them on <strong>*their*</strong> servers, and they push content back and forth to you through your web browser via your broadband connection. In other words, your computer now becomes a glorified dumb internet terminal that receives the images of the actions you perform in the video game; the OnLive servers do all of the heavy lifting of graphics processing.</p>
<p style="clear: both">So, the theory is that you can have a NetBook or an old Centrino laptop and you can play <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crysis" target="_blank">Crysis</a>!! Crysis on a NetBook?!? I don&#8217;t effing believe it. But that is their vision, and with the way the video game companies are <a href="http://www.onlive.com/partners.html" target="_blank">signing up in droves to be a part of this service</a> (can you say <a href="http://www.ea.com/" target="_blank">EA</a>?), this vision may actually have legs.</p>
<p style="clear: both">And if it has legs, oh my, how that changes things for companies like:</p>
<p style="clear: both"><a href="http://www.intel.com" target="_blank">Intel</a>, <a href="http://www.amd.com" target="_blank">AMD</a>: Video games are the most processor intensive applications in the world. If OnLive is successful, that opens the flood gates for more processor-intensive subscription-type markets. People can buy less powerful machines, but still get top quality functionality. That could eat heavily into the Intel and AMD profit margins &#8212; although, Intel and AMD should hope that OnLive buys their processors for the OnLive servers.</p>
<p style="clear: both"><a href="http://www.us.playstation.com/" target="_blank">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/xbox/" target="_blank">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://www.nintendo.com/wii" target="_blank">Nintendo</a>: Well, this is simple. The video game console becomes obsolete. As <a href="http://www.winsupersite.com/Default.asp" target="_blank">Paul Thurrott</a> alluded to in Windows Weekly &#8211; &#8216;Microsoft just wasted $5 billion in their XBox investment&#8217;</p>
<p style="clear: both">Now, of course, broadband would need to be plentiful. Quality of Service would need to be guaranteed. As they alluded in the Windows Weekly show &#8211; hey, <a href="http://www.comcast.com" target="_blank">Comcast</a>, are you listening? And, there are other hurdles to overcome. They were talking about <a href="http://www.amazon.com" target="_blank">Amazon</a> buying this service being a good play. I am not 100% convinced right now of that being a smart move; but if this does what I think it might do, then yes, any company should buy OnLive if they had the resources.</p>
<p style="clear: both">This is definitely something I will be keeping tabs on because this could be a &#8220;game changer&#8221; (pun absolutely intended). And I don&#8217;t say that often.</p>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joelmarcey.com/2009/03/31/onlive-intel-amd-microsoft-sony-nintendo-had-better-be-on-high-alert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
