<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Life of Constant Flux &#187; Licensing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelmarcey.com/tag/licensing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelmarcey.com</link>
	<description>Being Self-Employed, Technology, Life&#039;s Journey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Shares Source Code to the .NET Framework</title>
		<link>http://joelmarcey.com/2007/10/04/microsoft-opens-up-source-code-to-the-net-framework/</link>
		<comments>http://joelmarcey.com/2007/10/04/microsoft-opens-up-source-code-to-the-net-framework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Marcey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET Framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelmarcey.com/2007/10/04/microsoft-opens-up-source-code-to-the-net-framework/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this on Scott Guthrie&#8217;s blog yesterday (I must have had a brain freeze for leaving him off my blogroll): Releasing the Source Code for the .NET Framework Libraries This is good to see. And this is great news &#8230; <a href="http://joelmarcey.com/2007/10/04/microsoft-opens-up-source-code-to-the-net-framework/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this on Scott Guthrie&#8217;s blog yesterday (I must have had a brain freeze for leaving him off my blogroll):</p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/10/03/releasing-the-source-code-for-the-net-framework-libraries.aspx">Releasing the Source Code for the .NET Framework Libraries </a></p>
<p>This is good to see. And this is great news for software developers. For this post, let&#8217;s leave out the obvious technical reasons as to why this is a good idea for .NET software developers. Releasing the .NET Framework source in and of itself is to me, maybe surprisingly, really not the biggest news. We have been able to &#8220;view&#8221; the source code for a while now (thanks <a href="http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/">Lutz</a>!) &#8212; although, being able to &#8220;step&#8221; into the .NET Framework code in the debugger is huge!</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s instead focus on the business perception reasons. Microsoft has been slammed by many a person for being the <a href="http://redmondmag.com/features/article.asp?EditorialsID=564">800 pound gorilla</a>, an opportunistic monopoly, <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2005/08/software_notebo.html">the evil empire</a>, the company that pretends to care about software developers but doesn&#8217;t, &lt;insert your Microsoft slam here&gt;. Many of these come from the open source community. While Microsoft isn&#8217;t releasing the source to Windows or Office to the world, the .NET Framework is hardly a flash in the pan. I mean, they are <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/WinFX_Becomes_NET_Framework_30/1150130517">integrating the .NET Framework </a>and all of its siblings and underpinnings into many cash cows, including Windows. With this release, Microsoft is taking a huge step to fully understanding the importance of the software development community. I see this as just one of many steps that Microsoft is going to take in the future to make it real easy to have software developers target .NET, Windows and/or Microsoft technologies in their development &#8212; one semi-bold prognostication I have (and <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/wallym/archive/2007/04/30/net-framework-for-the-mac.aspx">others do too</a>) is the *full* .NET Framework on the Mac, not just via <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/">Silverlight</a>.</p>
<p>This alone won&#8217;t change many of the &#8220;gorilla&#8221; perceptions that people think about Microsoft, but it&#8217;s all about baby steps, and I think the baby is beginning to at least toddle around now.</p>
<p>Oh, and to those that think the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/licensingbasics/referencelicense.mspx">licensing</a> is bad&#8230;.it&#8217;s nothing that isn&#8217;t expected. All it is really saying in a nutshell is that you can view the source code but can&#8217;t modify it. That is perfectly reasonable. Microsoft is not a purely open source company, and won&#8217;t be, so this licensing allows exactly what the intention of the announcement is &#8212; for you to view the source code during your development process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joelmarcey.com/2007/10/04/microsoft-opens-up-source-code-to-the-net-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

